Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: A. V. D., a Child. Department of Human Services, Petitioner-Respondent, v. E. D., Appellant.
Mother appeals a judgment establishing juvenile-court jurisdiction over 16-year-old A. In four assignments of error, mother argues that the evidence is legally insufficient to warrant the juvenile court's jurisdiction, because the conditions and circumstances alleged by the Department of Human Services (DHS) do not expose A to a current, non-speculative risk of serious loss or injury. ORS 419B.100(1)(c). DHS concedes the error. We agree, accept the concession, and reverse the jurisdictional judgment.
Reversed.
PER CURIAM
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: A175571
Decided: November 24, 2021
Court: Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)