Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Matthew Steven RUIZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Defendant, who pleaded guilty to driving under the influence of intoxicants, ORS 813.010, entered into a diversion program. He now appeals a judgment terminating his diversion, sentencing him to probation, and imposing a fine. He first argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to dismiss. That issue is not reviewable under ORS 138.105(5). State v. Merrill, 311 Or.App. 487, 492 P.3d 722, modified on recons., 314 Or.App. 460, 495 P.3d 219 (2021). Defendant also argues that the trial court plainly erred with respect to its imposition of the fine. We reject that argument without discussion.
Affirmed.
PER CURIAM
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: A173612
Decided: November 17, 2021
Court: Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)