Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Hamid Michael HEJAZI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EUGENE POLICE DEPARTMENT, Lane County Sheriff's Office, City of Eugene, and Lane County, Defendants.
As allowed under ORS 19.205(2), and explained in Stanwood v. Multnomah County, 135 Or. App. 58, 60, 898 P.2d 196 (1995), plaintiff appeals an order denying his request for a waiver or deferral of filing fees and sheriff's service fees. Plaintiff's opening brief, however, contains no argument, and we affirm for that reason. See Smith v. Dept. of Corrections, 314 Or. App. 1, 496 P.3d 1073 (2021) (affirming denial of fee waiver where the appellant's brief contained no pertinent argument).
Affirmed.
PER CURIAM
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: A175344
Decided: September 15, 2021
Court: Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)