Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Henry Samuel WEST, Defendant-Appellant.
Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for recklessly endangering another person, arguing that the trial court plainly erred by failing to sua sponte instruct the jury that it must agree as to which of several driving maneuvers formed the basis of its verdict, and which of several other drivers on the road were endangered by that conduct. We affirm.
To prove the crime of recklessly endangering another person, the state may properly rely on defendant's course of driving which put all of the other drivers at a potential risk of harm—which may involve more than one individual, specific maneuver. Accordingly, the trial court did not err, plainly or otherwise, in failing to instruct the jury as to concurrence.
Affirmed.
PER CURIAM
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: A171715
Decided: September 09, 2021
Court: Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)