STATE v. GIBBENS (2021)

Defendant was convicted by unanimous jury verdict of first-degree sexual abuse (Count 1), ORS 163.427, and by nonunanimous jury verdict of first-degree sodomy (Count 2), ORS 163.405. He argues on appeal that the trial court erred in instructing the jury, over his objection, that it could return nonunanimous verdicts. He also argues that this constitutes structural error and that he is entitled to reversal of the conviction based on the unanimous verdict as well as the nonunanimous verdict. The state concedes the error with respect to the nonunanimous verdict on Count 2, in light of Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 U.S. ––––, 140 S. Ct. 1390, 206 L. Ed. 2d 583 (2020). We agree and accept that concession. Defendant argues that his remaining conviction also should be reversed based on the erroneous nonunanimous verdict instruction. We reject defendant's argument that his conviction based on a unanimous verdict also must be reversed. See State v. Flores Ramos, 367 Or. 292, 478 P.3d 515 (2020) (erroneous nonunanimous jury instruction was not structural error and was harmless with respect to unanimous verdicts).

Count 2 reversed and remanded; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.

PER CURIAM