STATE v. PRICE (2021)

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Catherine Anne PRICE, Defendant-Appellant.

A167517

Decided: June 03, 2021

Before DeVore, Presiding Judge, and DeHoog, Judge, and Mooney, Judge.

Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Matthew Blythe, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Robert M. Wilsey, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants, ORS 813.010(4), contending that the trial court erroneously terminated diversion and entered judgment pursuant to his plea. For the reasons stated in State v. Merrill, 311 Or. App. 487, ––– P.3d –––– (2021), ORS 138.105(5) bars review of that contention. Defendant also assigns error to the imposition of a fine $255 in excess of what the court announced at sentencing and to the imposition of two special conditions of probation. The state correctly concedes the errors. See State v. Lee, 303 Or. App. 477, 478, 461 P.3d 1043 (2020) (vacating fine and remanding for resentencing where court erred in imposing a greater DUII fine than announced at sentencing); State v. Bowden, 292 Or. App. 815, 818-19, 425 P.3d 475 (2018) (“The sentencing court does not have the discretion to impose a probation condition that runs counter to ORS 137.540(1)(b) and ORS 137.542.”).

Remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network