Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: R. R. M., a Person Alleged to have Mental Illness. State of Oregon, Respondent, v. R. R. M., Appellant.
Appellant appeals a judgment committing her to the custody of the Mental Health Division for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. She contends that the trial court committed plain error when it failed to advise her of her right pursuant to ORS 426.100(1) to subpoena witnesses. The state concedes the error. We agree and accept the concession. As we have held in numerous cases, failure to provide such statutory advice of rights constitutes plain error. See generally State v. B. O., 276 Or. App. 604, 605, 368 P.3d 82 (2016) (citing cases). Given the nature of civil commitment proceedings, the relative interests of the parties, the gravity of the error, and the ends of justice, we exercise discretion to correct the error.
Reversed.
PER CURIAM
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: A174454
Decided: March 31, 2021
Court: Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)