Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Linh Thi Minh TRAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CLEAR RECON CORP.; Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.; Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC; and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee for GSAA Home Equity Trust 2006-16, Asset-Backed Certificates Series 2006-16, Defendants-Respondents.
This appeal arises from a declaratory judgment action in which the trial court entered a limited judgment of dismissal, without prejudice, in favor of some defendants, and later entered a general judgment of dismissal, without prejudice, in favor of the remaining defendant. Those judgments dismissed plaintiff's case challenging a then-pending nonjudicial foreclosure of a deed of trust. On appeal, plaintiff raises a number of assignments of error. We reject plaintiff's assignments of error without discussion.
We vacate and remand, however, for entry of judgment declaring the rights of the parties. See Schroeder v. Clackamas County Bank, 291 Or. App. 16, 18, 419 P.3d 726, rev. den., 363 Or. 815, 431 P.3d 90 (2018) (“[B]ecause it is error to dismiss a claim for declaratory relief unless there is no justiciable controversy, we remand for the issuance of a judgment that declares the rights of the parties.”) (Footnote and citation omitted.)); see also City of Corvallis v. State of Oregon, 304 Or. App. 171, 190-91, 464 P.3d 1127 (2020) (explaining that the correct disposition in a declaratory judgment action is a declaration of the rights of the parties even if it is not the declaration sought by the plaintiff).
Vacated and remanded for entry of judgment declaring rights of the parties.
PER CURIAM
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: A167295
Decided: November 18, 2020
Court: Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)