HALLADAY v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST PRISON SUPERVISION (2020)

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Jeffrey D. HALLADAY, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION, Respondent.

A172740

Decided: August 19, 2020

Before Lagesen, Presiding Judge, and James, Judge, and Kamins, Judge.

Jeffrey D. Halladay filed the briefs pro se. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Jeff J. Payne, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Pursuant to ORS 183.400, petitioner challenges the validity of two rules of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision, OAR 255-060-0006(1) and OAR 255-060-0012(1). Petitioner argues that OAR 255-060-0006(1) exceeds the statutory authority of the board under ORS 144.280(1)(a) and (b), and that OAR 255-060-0012(1) violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and ex post facto prohibitions under the state and federal constitutions. We have considered those challenges and reject them without additional published discussion.

OAR 255-060-0006(1) and OAR 255-060-0012(1) held valid.

PER CURIAM

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network