STATE v. MARTINEZ MATEO (2020)

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for one count of first-degree rape, ORS 163.375, one count of second-degree sexual abuse, ORS 163.425, and three counts of first-degree sexual abuse, ORS 163.427. On appeal, he challenges the sufficiency of the evidence as to some of the convictions, and we reject those assignments of error without discussion. He also argues that the trial court erred in failing to merge the three first-degree sexual abuse verdicts (Counts 4, 5, and 7) and in imposing restitution in the amount of $2,632.99 to CARES Northwest for the cost of a medical evaluation of the victim. The state concedes that the trial court erred in failing to merge the first-degree sexual abuse verdicts. See State v. Nelson, 282 Or. App. 427, 386 P.3d 73 (2016) (verdicts on sexual abuse counts should be merged where the defendant’s conduct of sexually touching different body parts occurred in a single location and without pause). We agree and accept that concession. The state also concedes that restitution should not have been awarded to CARES Northwest under this circumstance. Again, we agree and accept the state’s concession. See, e.g., State v. Reyes, 299 Or. App. 369, 450 P.3d 521 (2019) (concluding that restitution for cost of CARES Northwest evaluation was erroneous under State v. Moreno-Hernandez, 365 Or. 175, 442 P.3d 1092 (2019), and other cases).

Convictions on Counts 4, 5, and 7 reversed and remanded for entry of a judgment of conviction on one count of first-degree sexual abuse; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.

PER CURIAM