STATE v. RUMLEY (2019)

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Robert Thomas RUMLEY, Defendant-Appellant.

A164006

Decided: January 09, 2019

Before Lagesen, Presiding Judge, and DeVore, Judge, and James, Judge.

Wayne Mackeson, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. Also on the brief was Wayne Mackeson, PC. Adam Holbrook, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. Also on the brief were Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, and Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General.

Affirmed. See State v. Donathan, 281 Or. App. 781, 383 P.3d 946 (2016), rev. den., 360 Or. 752, 388 P.3d 724 (2017) (construing ORS 813.010(5), a statute worded similarly to ORS 813.011(1), and concluding that the term “conviction” includes a finding of guilt); State v. Turntine, 265 Or. App. 323, 336 P.3d 513 (2014), rev. den., 356 Or. 690, 344 P.3d 1112 (2015) (likewise applying principles of statutory construction to conclude that the term “convicted” in ORS 163.160(3) includes a finding of guilt).

PER CURIAM

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law