IN RE: the MARRIAGE OF Catherine Mary COX (2019)

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

IN RE: the MARRIAGE OF Catherine Mary COX, Petitioner-Respondent, James Edward Cox, Respondent-Appellant.

A163479

Decided: January 09, 2019

Before Lagesen, Presiding Judge, and DeVore, Judge, and James, Judge.

AJ Wahl argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant. Helen C. Tompkins, Lake Oswego, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.

Husband appeals a dissolution judgment, assigning error to (1) the exclusion of certain evidence that, in husband’s view, was relevant to show his earning capacity and (2) the award of spousal support. A detailed recitation of the facts would not benefit the bench, bar, or public. Having reviewed the record before the trial court, we conclude that the exclusion of the evidence was not erroneous but that, if it was, any error was harmless. We conclude further that the factual findings underpinning the spousal support award are supported by evidence, and that the court did not legally err or otherwise abuse its discretion in ordering spousal support.

Affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network