STATE v. WHITE (2018)

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Daniel David WHITE, Defendant-Appellant.

A159685

Decided: November 07, 2018

Before Lagesen, Presiding Judge, and DeVore, Judge, and James, Judge.

Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Laura A. Frikert, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, for petition. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Patrick M. Ebbett, Assistant Attorney General, for response.

Defendant petitions for reconsideration of our opinion in State v. White, 293 Or. App. 62, 426 P.3d 203 (2018), on the ground that footnote 2 of that decision inaccurately describes defendant’s position with regard to arguments that were not raised in his supplemental briefing. We agree in part and replace that footnote with the following: “We confine our discussion to the probative value of the evidence with respect to delayed reporting, and we reject defendant’s remaining contentions without discussion.”

Reconsideration allowed; former opinion modified and adhered to as modified.

PER CURIAM

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network