Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: S. M., a Person Alleged to have Mental Illness. STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. S. M., Appellant.
Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing him to the custody of the Mental Health Division for a period not to exceed 180 days. See ORS 426.130. In his third assignment of error, appellant contends that the record lacked sufficient evidence that, due to a mental disorder, he was unable to provide for his basic needs.1 The state concedes that the evidence was insufficient to prove that appellant was unable to meet his basic needs and that the judgment should be reversed. We agree, accept the state's concession, and reverse the judgment.
Reversed.
FOOTNOTES
1. Our disposition of appellant's third assignment of error obviates the need to address his first and second assignments of error.
PER CURIAM
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: A162480
Decided: October 03, 2018
Court: Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)