Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Dennis REGEN and Taylor & Taylor Realty Co., dba The Prudential Taylor & Taylor Realty Company, Plaintiffs–Respondents, T.W. Cowgill; and Anthony Johnson, Plaintiffs, v. PICTURE BOOK PROPERTIES AND INVESTMENTS, INC., an Oregon corporation, Defendant–Appellant.
Dennis Regen and Taylor & Taylor Realty Co., dba The Prudential Taylor & Taylor Realty Company, Plaintiffs–Respondents, T.W. Cowgill and Anthony Johnson, Plaintiffs, v. Picture Book Properties and Investments, Inc., an Oregon corporation, Defendant–Appellant.
Defendant Picture Book Properties and Investments, Inc. (Picture Book) appeals the trial court's general judgment confirming an arbitration award, ORS 36.730(1)(c)(A), as well as the court's supplemental judgment awarding attorney fees to plaintiffs Dennis Regen (Regen) and Taylor & Taylor Realty Company (Taylor & Taylor), ORS 36.715(3).1 We reject without discussion Picture Book's assertion that the trial court erred in confirming the arbitration award and that both the general and supplemental judgments should be reversed on that basis. Picture Book also contends that the supplemental judgment must be vacated and remanded because, although Picture Book requested that the trial court make special findings of fact and state its conclusions of law pursuant to ORCP 68 C(4)(e), the court failed to do so.2 Under ORCP 68 C(4)(e), “[o]n the request of a party, the court shall make special findings of fact and state its conclusions of law on the record regarding the issues material to the award or denial of attorney fees.” Regen and Taylor & Taylor concede that the case must be remanded for the trial court to make “explanatory factual findings and conclusions of law.” We agree, accept the concession, and, accordingly, vacate and remand the supplemental judgment.
Supplemental judgment vacated and remanded; otherwise affirmed.
FOOTNOTES
1. The supplemental judgment also awarded fees and costs to plaintiffs T.W. Cowgill and Anthony Johnson. Those awards are not at issue on appeal.
2. Pursuant to the December 1, 2012, order of the Council on Court Procedures, ORCP 68 was amended effective January 1, 2014. See ORS 1.735. Because those amendments do not affect our analysis, we cite to the prior version of the rule.
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 104230; A149257 (Control), A151838.
Decided: February 05, 2014
Court: Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)