Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Kevin Wayne STUFFLEBEAN, Respondent, v. Tracy Lynn BROWN, Appellant.
This is an action for dissolution of a domestic partnership, a nonmarital relationship of individuals who have cohabited for a substantial period of time. On the merits, we affirmed the judgment of the trial court without opinion. Stufflebean v. Brown, 145 Or.App. 484, 928 P.2d 367 (1996). Respondent now petitions for an award of attorney fees pursuant to ORS 107.105(5) and for an award of costs. We deny the petition for attorney fees and allow costs in the amount of $204.10.
In Brazell v. Meyer, 42 Or.App. 179, 600 P.2d 460 (1979), we said in a footnote that, when a trial court ruled that it lacked authority to award attorney fees in an action for the dissolution of a domestic partnership: “That was correct.” Id. at 182 n 1, 600 P.2d 460. We offered no explanation or analysis for our conclusion. We write now briefly to reaffirm the conclusion we reached in Brazell and to explain it.
ORS 107.105(5) provides:
“If an appeal is taken from the decree or other appealable order in a suit for annulment or dissolution of a marriage or for separation, and the appellate court awards costs and disbursements to a party, it may also award to that party, as part of the costs, such additional sum of money as it may adjudge reasonable as an attorney fee on the appeal.”
(Emphasis supplied.) By its terms, ORS 107.105(5) applies only on appeal in an action for annulment or dissolution of a marriage or a separation in a marriage. It does not authorize the court to award attorney fees in any other suit or action. This case is not an action for annulment or dissolution of a marriage or for separation in a marriage; the parties were never married to each other. Instead, it is an action in equity that arises wholly apart from the dissolution statutes. See, e.g., Wilbur v. DeLapp, 119 Or.App. 348, 351, 850 P.2d 1151 (1993) (because Oregon does not recognize common-law marriage, nonmarried cohabitants are not subject to marital dissolution statutes). ORS 107.105(5), therefore, affords no basis for an award of attorney fees in this case.
As for costs, ORS 20.310 allows an award in “any appeal to the Court of Appeals.” Moreover, there is no objection to respondent's petition in that regard.
Petition for award of attorney fees denied; costs allowed in the amount of $204.10.
LANDAU, Presiding Judge.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 93DM0448; CA A91666.
Decided: April 09, 1997
Court: Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)