Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
MUSCOGEE (CREEK) NATION d/b/a, MUSCOGEE (CREEK) NATION CASINOS et al., Plaintiff/Appellee, v. (1) LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY; (2) UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S -- SYNDICATES: ASC 1414, XLC 2003, TAL 1183 MSP 318, ATL 1861, KLN 510, AGR 3268; (3) UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S -- SYNDICATE: CNP 4444; (4) UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S -- ASPEN SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY; (5) UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S -- SYNDICATES: KLN 0510, ATL 1861, ASC 1414, QBE 1886, MSP 0318, APL 1969, CHN 2015, XLC 2003; (6) UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S -- SYNDICATE: BRT 2987; (7) UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S -- SYNDICATES: KLN 0510, TMK 1880, BRT 2987, BRT 2988, CNP 4444, ATL 1861, NEON WORLDWIDE PROPERTY CONSORTIUM, AUW 0609, TAL 1183, AUL 1274; (8) HOMELAND INSURANCE COMPANY OF NY (ONE BEACON); (9) HALLMARK SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY; (10) ENDURANCE WORLDWIDE INSURANCE LTD. T/AS SOMPO INTERNATIONAL; (11) ARCH SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY; (12) EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY; (13) ALLIED WORLD NATIONAL ASSURANCE COMPANY; (14) LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY; (15) XL INSURANCE AMERICA, INC.; (16) AXA/XL AMERICA, INC.;1 (17) UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S LONDON;2 (18) ABC INSURANCE COMPANIES (to be ) determined); Defendants/Appellants.
ORDER OF SUMMARY DISPOSITION
¶1 Rule 1.201 of the Oklahoma Supreme Court Rules provides that “[i]n any case in which it appears that a prior controlling appellate decision is dispositive of the appeal, the Court may summarily affirm or reverse, citing in its order of summary disposition this rule and the controlling decision.” Okla. Sup. Ct. Rule 1.201, 12 O.S.2021, ch. 15, app. 1.
¶2 On July 12, 2021, this Court designated this case, Cherokee Nation v. Lexington Insurance Company (Case No. 119,359), 2022 OK 71, and Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma v. Lexington Insurance Company (Case No. 119,413) as companion cases. The sole issue in each of the companion cases is whether the district court correctly determined that business interruption coverage for the insured's losses “caused by direct physical loss or damage ․ to real and/or personal property“ includes losses incurred by some intangible harm that rendered the insured's property unusable for its intended purpose.
¶3 THE COURT FINDS that our decision in Cherokee Nation v. Lexington Insurance Company, 2022 OK 71, involves the same primary legal question as that in the above-styled appeal. Therefore, our holding in Cherokee Nation that the policy language “direct physical loss or damage ․ to real and/or personal property” requires immediate, actual or tangible deprivation or destruction of property disposes of the issues herein. Muscogee (Creek) Nation does not present any evidence that its property was tangibly damaged, and the policy at issue does not cover its alleged business interruption losses.
¶4 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the district court's order sustaining the Muscogee (Creek) Nation's motion for partial summary judgment on business interruption coverage is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings.
¶5 DONE BY ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT IN CONFERENCE THIS 23rd day of January, 2023.
/S/CHIEF JUSTICE
¶1 I concur in the Court's order reversing the partial summary judgment granted in favor of the Muscogee (Creek) Nation and remanding the cause to the district court for further proceedings based upon our ruling in Cherokee Nation v. Lexington Insurance Co., et al., 2022 OK 71. I would, however, set this matter for oral argument to address the legitimate issues raised in the Petition for Rehearing filed in Cherokee Nation, 2022 OK 71 (rehearing denied, Rowe J., dissenting).
I dissent for the reasons stated in Cherokee Nation v. Lexington Ins. Co., 2022 OK 71, ___ P.3d ___.
Citationizer© Summary of Documents Citing This Document
Cite Name Level None Found. Citationizer: Table of Authority Cite Name Level Oklahoma Supreme Court Cases Cite Name Level 2022 OK 71, CHEROKEE NATION v. LEXINGTON INSURANCE CO. Discussed at Length
oscn
EMAIL: webmaster@oscn.net
Oklahoma Judicial Center
2100 N Lincoln Blvd.
Oklahoma City, OK 73105
courts
• Supreme Court of Oklahoma
• Court of Criminal Appeals
• Court of Civil Appeals
• District Courts
decisions
• New Decisions
• Supreme Court of Oklahoma
• Court of Criminal Appeals
• Court of Civil Appeals
programs
• The Sovereignty Symposium
• Alternative Dispute Resolution
• Early Settlement Mediation
• Children's Court Improvement Program (CIP)
• Judicial Nominating Commission
• Certified Courtroom Interpreters
• Certified Shorthand Reporters
• Accessibility ADA
• Contact Us
• Careers
• Accessibility ADA
RECUSED: KAUGER, J.
CONCUR: KANE, C.J., ROWE, V.C.J. (BY SEPARATE WRITING), WINCHESTER, DARBY, AND KUEHN, JJ., PRINCE, S.J. DISSENT: EDMONDSON, COMBS (BY SEPARATE WRITING), AND GURICH, JJ.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: Case Number: 119701
Decided: January 23, 2023
Court: Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)