Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
State of Oklahoma ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Association, Complainant, v. Ryan Steven Wiehl, Respondent.
ORDER OF IMMEDIATE INTERIM SUSPENSION
¶1 The Oklahoma Bar Association (OBA), in compliance with Rules 7.1 and 7.2 of the Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings (RGDP), forwarded to this Court certified copies of the following: (1) Information, charging Respondent with counts 1 and 2 Assault and Battery Upon A Police Officer, in violation of 21 O.S. § 649(B), felonies, count 3 Assault And/Or Battery On A Emergency Medical Technician or Care Provider, in violation of 21 O.S. § 650.4, count 4 Threaten an Act of Violence, in violation of 21 O.S. § 1378(B), a Misdemeanor, counts 5 and 6 Assault On A Police Officer, in violation of 21 O.S. § 649(A), a misdemeanor, count 7 Resisting An Officer, in violation of 21 O.S. § 268, a misdemeanor, count 8 Assault On A Police Officer, in violation of 21 O.S. § 649(A), a misdemeanor, count 9 Obstructing An Officer, in violation of 21 O.S. § 540, a misdemeanor, count 10 Assault in violation of 21 O.S. § 644(A), a misdemeanor, counts 11 and 12 Threaten an Act of Violence, in violation of 21 O.S. § 1378(B), misdemeanors, count 13 Assault and Battery in violation of 21 O.S. § 644(B), a misdemeanor, count 14 Outraging Public Decency in violation of 21 O.S. § 22, a misdemeanor, and count 15 Public Intoxication in violation of 37A O.S. § 6.101.D, a misdemeanor; (2) Plea of No Contest; and (3) Order of Deferred Sentence in the State of Oklahoma v. Ryan Wiehl, in the District Court of Tulsa County, CF-2022-1953.
¶2 On October 18, 2022, Respondent entered a plea of no contest to the above-referenced crimes. The Court deferred sentencing for one (1) year on all counts until September 29, 2023, and ordered conditions for probation.
¶3 RGDP 7.3 provides: “Upon receipt of the certified copies of Judgment and Sentence on a plea of guilty, order deferring judgment and sentence, indictment or information and the judgment and sentence, the Supreme Court may by order immediately suspend the lawyer from the practice of law until further order of the Court.” Having received certified copies of these papers and orders, and in view of the prior conduct resulting in discipline, this Court orders that Ryan Steven Wiehl is immediately suspended from the practice of law. Ryan Steven Wiehl is directed to show cause, if any, no later than November 28, 2022, why this order of interim suspension should be set aside. See RGDP Rule 7.3. The OBA has until December 9, 2022, to respond.
¶4 Rule 7.2 of the RGDP provides that a certified copy of a plea of guilty, an order deferring judgment and sentence, or information and judgment and sentence of conviction “shall constitute the charge and be conclusive evidence of the commission of the crime upon which the judgment and sentence is based and shall suffice as the basis for discipline in accordance with these rules.” Pursuant to Rule 7.4, Ryan Steven Wiehl has until December 28, 2022, to show cause in writing why a final order of discipline should not be made. The written return of the lawyer shall be verified and expressly state whether a hearing is desired. The lawyer may in the interest of explaining his conduct or by way of mitigating the discipline to be imposed upon him, submit a brief and/or any evidence tending to mitigate the severity of discipline. The OBA has until January 18, 2022, to respond.
¶5 DONE BY ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT in conference on November 14, 2022.
Citationizer© Summary of Documents Citing This Document
Cite Name Level None Found. Citationizer: Table of Authority Cite Name Level Title 21. Crimes and Punishments Cite Name Level 21 O.S. 1378, Punishment for Planning or Threatening Violent Act Discussed 21 O.S. 22, Acts Resulting in Gross Injury - Misdemeanor Cited 21 O.S. 268, Resistance to Executive Officer's Performance of Duty Cited 21 O.S. 540, Obstruction of Public Officer - Recording the Activity of an Officer in a Public Area Cited 21 O.S. 644, Punishment for Assault and Battery Discussed 21 O.S. 649, Assault and Battery Upon Police Officer, Sheriff, etc. - Penalties Discussed at Length 21 O.S. 650.4, Assault and Battery Upon Medical Care Provider - Penalty Cited
oscn
EMAIL: webmaster@oscn.net
Oklahoma Judicial Center
2100 N Lincoln Blvd.
Oklahoma City, OK 73105
courts
• Supreme Court of Oklahoma
• Court of Criminal Appeals
• Court of Civil Appeals
• District Courts
decisions
• New Decisions
• Supreme Court of Oklahoma
• Court of Criminal Appeals
• Court of Civil Appeals
programs
• The Sovereignty Symposium
• Alternative Dispute Resolution
• Early Settlement Mediation
• Children's Court Improvement Program (CIP)
• Judicial Nominating Commission
• Certified Courtroom Interpreters
• Certified Shorthand Reporters
• Accessibility ADA
• Contact Us
• Careers
• Accessibility ADA
ALL JUSTICES CONCUR.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: Case Number: SCBD-7359
Decided: November 14, 2022
Court: Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)