Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
AMERICAN INVESTIGATIVE & SECURITY, Petitioner, v. Charles Albert HAMILTON and State Insurance Fund, Respondent.
ORDER
This proceeding was brought by the employer [petitioner] to review an order by the Workers' Compensation Court declaring that the State Insurance Fund [respondent] did not, at the critical time in question, provide insurance coverage for the employer's liability under the Oklahoma compensation regime for injured workers.
Upon an earlier sua sponte inquiry into its jurisdiction, the court now concludes and holds that the order dismissing the risk carrier as a party respondent in the claim is the functional equivalent of a disposition that denies the insurer's liability for an award. It is hence reviewable. Hermetics Switch, Inc. v. Sales, 1982 OK 12, 640 P.2d 963; see also In re Hines, 1973 OK 46, 509 P.2d 669, 672.
The instant proceeding shall advance to final disposition.
KAUGER, C.J.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 91188.
Decided: June 15, 1998
Court: Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)