DAYTON v. STATE (2022)

Supreme Court of Ohio.

The City of DAYTON, Appellee, v. The STATE of Ohio, Appellant.

No. 2021-0592

Decided: June 22, 2022

Barbara J. Doseck, Dayton City Attorney, and John C. Musto, Dayton Chief Trial Counsel, for appellee. Dave Yost, Attorney General, Benjamin M. Flowers, Solicitor General, Stephen P. Carney, Deputy Solicitor General, and Caitlyn Nestleroth Johnson and Iris Jin, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellant.

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is vacated, and the cause is remanded to that court for application of Newburgh Hts. v. State, ––– Ohio St.3d ––––, 2022-Ohio-1642, ––– N.E.3d ––––.

Kennedy, Fischer, DeWine, Donnelly, Stewart, and Brunner, JJ., concur. O'Connor, C.J., would reverse the court of appeals’ judgment only as to the home-rule issues.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law