LINDSAY APPELLEE ET AL v. THE CITY OF GARFIELD HEIGHTS ET AL APPELLANTS (2022)

Supreme Court of Ohio.

LINDSAY, APPELLEE, ET AL., v. THE CITY OF GARFIELD HEIGHTS ET AL., APPELLANTS.

No. 2020-1032

Decided: December 30, 2022

Dworken & Bernstein Co., L.P.A., Patrick J. Perotti, Nicole T. Fiorelli, and James S. Timmerberg, for appellee, Nell Lindsay. Bricker & Eckler, L.L.P., and Quintin F. Lindsmith, for appellant Redflex Traffic Systems, Inc. O'Toole, McLaughlin, Dooley & Pecora Co., L.P.A., and John D. Latchney, for appellant City of Garfield Heights.

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Lycan v. Cleveland, __ Ohio St.3d __, 2022-Ohio-4676, __ N.E.3d __.

KENNEDY, DEWINE, STEWART, and BRUNNER, JJ., concur. O'CONNOR, C.J., and DONNELLY, J., dissent for the reasons set forth in Chief Justice O'Connor’s dissenting opinion in Lycan. FISCHER, J., dissents and would order briefing.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law