Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
EIGHMEY, Appellee, et al., v. The City of CLEVELAND, Appellant.
{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Lycan v. Cleveland, ––– Ohio St.3d ––––, 2022-Ohio-4676, ––– N.E.3d ––––.
Kennedy, DeWine, Stewart, and Brunner, JJ., concur. O'Connor, C.J., and Donnelly, J., dissent for the reasons set forth in Chief Justice O'Connor’s dissenting opinion in Lycan. Fischer, J., dissents and would order briefing.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 2020-0677
Decided: December 30, 2022
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)