Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
CAIN et al., Appellees, v. HORN et al., Appellants.
{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals as to proposition of law No. I is affirmed on the authority of West v. Bode, 162 Ohio St.3d 293, 2020-Ohio-5473, 165 N.E.3d 298.
{¶ 2} Proposition of law No. II of the appeal is dismissed as having been improvidently accepted.
O'Connor, C.J., and French, Fischer, DeWine, and Stewart, JJ., concur. Kennedy and Donnelly, JJ., concur in part and dissent in part and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals as to proposition of law No. I.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 2020-0761
Decided: December 29, 2020
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)