Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The STATE EX REL. ROBINSON, Appellant, v. ADULT PAROLE AUTHORITY, Appellee.
{¶ 1} Appellant, Damon Robinson, commenced this action in the Tenth District Court of Appeals seeking a writ of mandamus against appellee, Ohio Adult Parole Authority. The court of appeals referred the case to a magistrate, and on July 25, 2016, the magistrate purported to dismiss the petition sua sponte. On November 30, 2017, we affirmed the judgment of the court of appeals. ––– Ohio St.3d ––––, 2017-Ohio-8721, ––– N.E.3d ––––.
{¶ 2} Upon further consideration, however, we conclude that we lacked jurisdiction to hear and decide the case. Proceedings before a magistrate are governed by Civ.R. 53, as expressly incorporated by Loc.R. 13(M)(1) of the Tenth District Court of Appeals. Under that rule, a “magistrate's decision is not effective unless adopted by the court.” Civ.R. 53(D)(4)(a). For this reason, a magistrate's decision, standing alone, is not a final, appealable order. See State ex rel. Boddie v. Franklin Cty. 911 Admr., 135 Ohio St.3d 248, 2013-Ohio-401, 985 N.E.2d 1263. Because the court of appeals did not adopt the magistrate's decision, Robinson never received a final, appealable order.
{¶ 3} We hereby withdraw the prior opinion and order it withdrawn from official publication. It therefore has no precedential value. See In re Adoption of Ridenour, 61 Ohio St.3d 319, 327, 574 N.E.2d 1055 (1991), fn. 6. We dismiss this appeal for lack of a final, appealable order.
Cause dismissed.
Per Curiam.
O'Connor, C.J., and French, O'Neill, Fischer, and DeWine, JJ., concur. O'Donnell and Kennedy, JJ., concur in judgment only.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 2016–1181
Decided: January 24, 2018
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)