v. (2011)

{¶ 1} The following cases were held for the decision in In re D.J.S., ––– Ohio St.3d ––––, 2011–Ohio–5342, ––– N.E.2d ––––. The judgments of the courts of appeals are hereby reversed and the causes remanded to the trial court for application of State v. Williams, 129 Ohio St.3d 344, 2011–Ohio–3374, ––– N.E.2d ––––.

{¶ 2} 2008–1926. In re G.E.S., Summit App. No. 24079, 2008–Ohio–4076.

{¶ 3} 2008–2257. In re M.D.G., Allen App. No. 1–08–11, 2008–Ohio–5198.

{¶ 4} 2009–0223. In re A.R., Warren App. No. CA2008–03–036, 2008–Ohio–6566.

{¶ 5} 2009–0224. In re L. F., Stark App. No.2007–CA–00333, 2008–Ohio–6669.

{¶ 6} 2009–0243. In re T.C.H., Summit App. Nos. 24130 and 24131, 2008–Ohio–6614.

{¶ 7} 2009–0358. In re S.R.P., Preble App. No. CA2007–11–027, 2009–Ohio–11.

{¶ 8} 2009–0826. In re J.C., Summit App. No. 24354, 2009–Ohio–1213.

{¶ 9} 2009–0845. In re J.L.T., Geauga App. No.2008–G–2813, 2009–Ohio–1314.

{¶ 10} 2009–1929. In re A.K., Medina App. No. 09CA0025–M, 2009–Ohio–4941.

{¶ 11} 2010–0780. In re J.A.M, Wyandot App. No. 16–09–17, 2010–Ohio–1088.

{¶ 12} 2011–0257. In re J.B.A., Licking App. No. 10–CA–30, 2010–Ohio–6564.

{¶ 13} 2011–0325. In re A.C., Hamilton App. No. C–100136.

{¶ 14} 2011–0515. In re T.D., Clinton App. No. CA2010–01–002, 2011–Ohio–671.

{¶ 15} The following case was held for the decision in In re D.J.S., –––Ohio St.3d ––––, 2011–Ohio–5342, ––– N.E.2d ––––. It is hereby dismissed as having been improvidently accepted.

{¶ 16} 2009–1480. In re C.A., Montgomery App. No. 23022, 2009–Ohio–3303.

O'CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur. O'DONNELL, J., dissents and would affirm the judgments of the courts of appeals.