OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. BROWN (1998)

Supreme Court of Ohio.

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. BROWN.

No. 98-399.

Decided: November 10, 1998

Jonathan E. Coughlan, Disciplinary Counsel, Kevin L. Williams and Lori J. Brown, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator. James J. Chester, Columbus, for respondent.

Per Curiam. We adopt the findings of the board and its conclusions that respondent violated the Disciplinary Rules as charged. Respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law. A condition of respondent's possible reinstatement will be evidence of compliance with his contract with OLAP. Costs are taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

PER CURIAM.

MOYER, C.J., and RESNICK, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, FRANCIS E. SWEENEY, Sr. and PFEIFER, JJ., would suspend respondent for two years with one year stayed.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network