CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION v. PYATT (1997)

Supreme Court of Ohio.

CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION v. PYATT.

No. 97-872.

Decided: November 05, 1997

Gates T. Richards and Edwin W. Patterson III, Cincinnati, for relator. Jeffrey S. Pyatt, pro se.

Per Curiam. Based upon the record before us and the findings of the board with respect to respondent's failure to respond to relator's inquiries, we conclude that respondent not only has failed to cooperate in a disciplinary investigation, but also has failed to maintain his good standing with this court both by failing to register with the Clerk of Court for the current biennium, as required by Gov.Bar R. VI, and by failing to advise the Clerk of his current office address as required by Gov.Bar R. VI(1)(D).

We therefore adopt the recommendation of the board and indefinitely suspend respondent from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs of these proceedings are taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

PER CURIAM.

MOYER, C.J., and DOUGLAS, RESNICK, FRANCIS E. SWEENEY, Sr., PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network