Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
CAUDILL, Appellant, v. BRIGANO, Warden, Appellee.
{¶ 1} In 1997, the Hancock County Court of Common Pleas convicted appellant, Danny Caudill, of two counts of engaging in a pattern of corrupt activity, two counts of possession of drugs, one count of funding drug trafficking, and one count of funding marijuana trafficking, and sentenced him to prison and fined him. On appeal, the Court of Appeals for Hancock County remanded for correction of a sentencing error and otherwise affirmed. State v. Caudill (Dec. 2, 1998), Hancock App. No. 05-97-35, 1998 WL 833729.
{¶ 2} In February 2003, Caudill filed a petition in the Court of Appeals for Warren County for a writ of habeas corpus to compel appellee, Anthony Brigano, his prison warden, to release him from prison. Caudill claimed that the state had failed to introduce sufficient evidence to support his convictions. In March 2003, the court of appeals sua sponte dismissed Caudill's petition because his claims “are not the proper subject of a habeas corpus action.”
{¶ 3} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. “Habeas corpus will not issue to raise claims of insufficiency of evidence * * *.” State ex rel. Bruggeman v. Leonard (1999), 86 Ohio St.3d 298, 299, 714 N.E.2d 921; Cornell v. Schotten (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 466, 467, 633 N.E.2d 1111. Caudill should have raised these claims in his appeal. Ellis v. McMackin (1992), 65 Ohio St.3d 161, 162, 602 N.E.2d 611.
Judgment affirmed.
PER CURIAM.
MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, FRANCIS E. SWEENEY, SR., PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O'CONNOR and O'DONNELL, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 2003-0670.
Decided: September 24, 2003
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)