Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
JENNINGS, Appellant, v. JACKSON, Warden, Appellee.
{¶ 1} On November 8, 2000, the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas convicted appellant, Ellis L. Jennings, of four counts of gross sexual imposition and sentenced him to seven years in prison. On appeal, the court of appeals affirmed. State v. Jennings (Sept. 13, 2001), Franklin App. No. 00AP-1283, 2001 WL 1045490.
{¶ 2} On September 12, 2003, Jennings filed a petition in the Court of Appeals for Warren County for a writ of habeas corpus to compel his release from prison. Jennings claimed that his trial court lacked jurisdiction to convict and sentence him because the R.C. 2901.13 statute of limitations had expired before the state's prosecution had commenced. Appellee, Warren Correctional Institution Warden Wanza Jackson, moved to dismiss the petition. On November 6, 2003, the court of appeals granted Jackson's motion and dismissed the petition.
{¶ 3} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. “[A] violation of R.C. 2901.13 does not divest the trial court of jurisdiction and is thus not cognizable in habeas corpus.” Daniel v. State, 98 Ohio St.3d 467, 2003-Ohio-1916, 786 N.E.2d 891, ¶ 7. “Claims such as statute-of-limitations violations ‘must be raised on appeal rather than by extraordinary writ.’ ” Id. at ¶ 8, quoting State ex rel. Tubbs Jones v. Suster (1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 70, 76, 701 N.E.2d 1002.1
Judgment affirmed.
FOOTNOTES
1. We deny Jennings's request for oral argument.
PER CURIAM.
MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, FRANCIS E. SWEENEY, SR., PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O'CONNOR and O'DONNELL, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 2003-2153.
Decided: May 12, 2004
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)