DAYTON BAR ASSOCIATION v. AUSTIN (1997)

Supreme Court of Ohio.

DAYTON BAR ASSOCIATION v. AUSTIN.

No. 97-1748.

Decided: December 31, 1997

John M. Ruffolo, Dayton, for relator. Gary J. Leppla, Dayton, for respondent.

Per Curiam. We adopt the findings and conclusions of the board. Based upon the mitigating circumstances, we find, as recommended by the board, that respondent ought to be and he hereby is publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

PER CURIAM.

MOYER, C.J., and DOUGLAS, RESNICK, FRANCIS E. SWEENEY, Sr., PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law