OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. WHERRY (2000)

 Per Curiam.  We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board.   As we noted in Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Belock (1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 98, 100, 694 N.E.2d 897, 899, “The continuing public confidence in the judicial system and the bar requires that the strictest discipline be imposed in misappropriation cases.”   The appropriate sanction when a lawyer knowingly converts funds for the lawyer's benefit is disbarment.   Cf. Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Churilla (1997), 78 Ohio St.3d 348, 678 N.E.2d 515.   In this case, respondent not only converted funds but also filed false reports with the probate court.

Respondent is hereby permanently disbarred from the practice of law in Ohio.   Costs are taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

PER CURIAM.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, FRANCIS E. SWEENEY, SR., PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.