Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
KUNEFF v. OHIO BUREAU OF MOTOR VEHICLES.
FINDINGS OF FACT
{¶ 1} 1. On May 17, 2002, plaintiff, Yvonne Kuneff, filed a complaint against defendant, Ohio Bureau of Motor Vehicles, alleging that her son's driver's license was improperly listed as suspended by defendant. Plaintiff incurred towing expenses as a result of defendant's error concerning the driving status of plaintiff's son. Plaintiff seeks damages in the amount of $55.
{¶ 2} 2. On December 4, 2002, defendant filed an investigation report admitting error in recording plaintiff's son's driving status.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
{¶ 3} 1. Resulting damages may be recovered when the fact is proven, by a preponderance of the evidence, that defendant erroneously listed a driver's license as suspended. Ankney v. Ohio Bur. of Motor Vehicles (1998), Ct. of Cl. No. 97-11045-AD; Serbanescu v. Ohio Bur. of Motor Vehicles (1994), Ct. of Cl. No. 93-15038-AD; Black v. Ohio Bur. of Motor Vehicles (1996), Ct. of Cl. No. 95-01441-AD.
{¶ 4} 2. Plaintiff has proven, by a preponderance of the evidence, that her son's driver's license was improperly listed as suspended by defendant. McGee v. Ohio Bur. of Motor Vehicles (1997), Ct. of Cl. No. 97-03999-AD.
{¶ 5} 3. Defendant is liable to plaintiff for damages that plaintiff can prove resulted from defendant's negligence. Partlow v. Ohio Bur. of Motor Vehicles (1997), Ct. of Cl. No. 97-07820-AD. Plaintiff has proven that she incurred towing costs as a result of defendant's act.
{¶ 6} 4. Plaintiff has suffered damages in the amount of $55, plus the $25 filing fee, which may be reimbursed as compensable damages pursuant to the holding in Bailey v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr. (1990), 62 Ohio Misc.2d 19, 587 N.E.2d 990.
{¶ 7} Having considered all of the evidence in the claim file and adopting the memorandum decision concurrently herewith,
{¶ 8} IT IS ORDERED THAT:
{¶ 9} 1. Plaintiff's claim be GRANTED and judgment be rendered in favor of the plaintiff;
{¶ 10} 2. Defendant (Bureau of Motor Vehicles) pay plaintiff (Yvonne Kuneff) $80 and such interest as is allowed by law;
{¶ 11} 3. Court costs are assessed against defendant.
Order accordingly.
DANIEL R. BORCHERT, Deputy Clerk.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 2002-05018-AD.
Decided: January 14, 2003
Court: Court of Claims of Ohio.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)