Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, v. Tyrone Hayes, Defendant.
In his omnibus motion, Mr. Hayes moves for an order granting a bill of particulars (CPL 200.95, 100.45 [4]); suppressing a noticed statement as unconstitutionally obtained (People v Huntley, 15 NY2d [1965], Dunaway v New York, 442 US200 [1978]); precluding the People from introducing any unnoticed statements or identifications at trial (CPL 710.30 [3]); and precluding the People from introducing evidence of prior bad acts at trial (People v Sandoval, 34 NY2d 371 [1974]; People v Molineux, 168 NY 264 [1901]).
The motion for a bill of particulars is denied. There is no indication that defense counsel requested a bill of particulars from the People. Unless the defendant files such a demand and the People either refuse to comply or fail to do so in a timely manner, the court has no statutory authority to consider such a motion (CPL 200.95 [5]). Mr. Hayes also did not indicate in his motion what information he is requesting from the prosecution, and as such the court cannot determine whether "the items of factual information requested are authorized to be included in a bill of particulars, and that such information is necessary to enable the defendant adequately to prepare or conduct his defense" (id.).
Next, the motion to suppress the noticed statement is granted to the extent that a Huntley/Dunaway hearing will be conducted before trial. The parties' allegations create a factual dispute that must be resolved at an evidentiary hearing (see CPL 710.60 [4]).
Next, the motions to preclude unnoticed statement and identification evidence and to preclude evidence of prior bad acts are referred to the trial court. As Mr. Hayes was arraigned on February 19, 2025, the People should already have performed their initial discovery obligations (see CPL 245.10 [1] [a] [ii]). If they have not, they are ordered to do so as soon as practicable. The People are also directed to provide supplemental discovery to the defense as soon as practicable and at least fifteen calendar days prior to the first scheduled trial date (CPL 245.20 [3]; CPL 245.10 [1] [b]).
This constitutes the decision and order of the court.
Dated: May 5, 2025
New York, NY
Ilona B. Coleman, J.C.C.
Ilona B. Coleman, J.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: CR-001177-25NY
Decided: May 05, 2025
Court: Criminal Court, City of New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)