Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468–a. Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Petitioner; v. Jou Ru Lee, Respondent. (Attorney Registration No. 4068821)
DECISION AND ORDER
ON MOTION
DEPARTMENT,
Calendar Date: September 14, 2026
Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany (Alison M. Coan of counsel), for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department. Motion by respondent for an order reinstating him to the practice of law following his suspension by October 2021 order of this Court (Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 198 AD3d 1068, 1080 [3d Dept 2021]; see Rules for Atty Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.16; Rules of App Div, 3d Dept [22 NYCRR] § 806.16).
Upon reading respondent's notice of motion and affidavit with exhibits sworn to June 29, 2026, respondent's supplemental affidavit sworn to August 6, 2026, and the September 9, 2026 responsive correspondence from the Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, we have determined, by clear
and convincing evidence, that (1) respondent has complied with the order of suspension and the rules of this Court, (2) respondent has the requisite character and fitness to practice law,
/or Law Practice Management (see Rules of App.Div., All Depts [22 NYCRR] § 1500.2[d], [e] ) that specifically relate to the practice of law in New York (see Rules of App.Div., 3d Dept [22 NYCRR] § 806.16[c][5][i] ); (2) file an amended registration statement in full compliance with Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (22 NYCRR) § 118.1(e)(14);
(3) provide proof of their compliance with these conditions to both this Court
the Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department within 60 days of this Court's order. Accordingly, it is
it is further
counselor-at-law, effective immediately, subject to the conditions set forth in this decision.
Clark, J.P., Fisher, McShan, Powers
Ryba, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: PM–218–26
Decided: October 01, 2026
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Make It a Preferred Google Search Source
Add to GoogleGet help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)