Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Fan ZHANG, et al., respondents, v. Paul FEINER, in his official capacity as Supervisor of the Town of Greenburgh, et al., appellants.
DECISION & ORDER
In a hybrid proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to review a determination of the respondent/defendant Paul Feiner, in his official capacity as Supervisor of the Town of Greenburgh, dated September 27, 2024, which, after a hearing, determined that a petition for the incorporation of the proposed Village of Edgemont did not comply with the requirements of Village Law article 2, and action for a judgment declaring that the petition for the incorporation of the proposed Village of Edgemont complies with the requirements of Village Law article 2, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Melissa A. Loehr, J.), dated September 24, 2025. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted the petitioners/plaintiffs' cross-motion pursuant to CPLR 408 and 3042(e) to vacate demands for bills of particulars, and denied the respondents/defendants' motion pursuant to CPLR 3042 and 3126 to strike the petition/complaint.
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
The appeal from the order must be dismissed, as no appeal lies as of right from an intermediate order entered in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (see id. § 5701[b][1] ), and because any possibility of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of an order and judgment in the matter (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248). The issues raised on the appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the order and judgment (see CPLR 5501[a][1]; Matter of Zhang v Feiner, ––– AD3d –––– [Appellate Division Docket No. 2026–03201; decided herewith] ).
DILLON, J.P., CHRISTOPHER, WARHIT and GOLDBERG VELAZQUEZ, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 2025–12926, (Index 74054 /24)
Decided: September 30, 2026
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Make It a Preferred Google Search Source
Add to GoogleGet help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)