Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Etc., Appellant, v. Nii Badu KOTEI, Respondent, et al., Defendants.
DECISION & ORDER
In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Karen B. Rothenberg, J.), dated January 10, 2019. The order denied the plaintiff's motion for leave to reargue its prior motion for a judgment of foreclosure and sale, which had been denied in an order of the same court dated March 8, 2018.
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as no appeal lies from an order denying reargument.
The underlying facts of this action are summarized in a companion appeal decided herewith (see U.S. Bank N.A. v Kotei, ––– AD3d –––– [Appellate Division Docket No. 2024–04129] ).
Following the denial of the plaintiff's motion for a judgment of foreclosure and sale, the plaintiff moved for leave to reargue that motion. The Supreme Court denied leave to reargue in an order dated January 10, 2019. The plaintiff appeals.
The appeal from the order dated January 10, 2019, must be dismissed, as the denial of a motion for leave to reargue is not appealable (see People v Blackwood, 231 AD3d 1165, 1166; Brilliantine v East Hampton Fuel Oil Corp., 221 AD3d 951, 952; Matter of Lillian G. [Steven G.—Gary G.], 208 AD3d 871, 874). Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, there is no evidence in the record that the Supreme Court granted reargument and adhered to its original determination.
GENOVESI, J.P., WARHIT, GOLIA and HOM, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 2024–11869
Decided: September 16, 2026
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Make It a Preferred Google Search Source
Add to GoogleGet help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)