Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Fritz-Michael D. PARKINSON, Claimant, v. MANHATTAN AND BRONX SURFACE TRANSIT OPERATING AUTHORITY, Appellant. Workers' Compensation Board, Respondent.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Appeal from a decision of the Workers' Compensation Board, filed March 26, 2025, which ruled that claimant sustained a causally related psychological injury and established his claim for workers' compensation benefits.
Claimant, a bus operator, was stopped at a traffic light when he witnessed a box truck run over and kill a bicyclist. Claimant thereafter filed a claim for workers' compensation benefits, alleging that he suffered a psychological injury as a result. Following various proceedings, a Workers' Compensation Law Judge, among other things, established the claim. Upon an administrative appeal, the Workers' Compensation Board, in a decision filed March 26, 2025, affirmed that decision. The employer appeals.
After the issuance of the March 2025 decision, the Board issued a new decision on March 16, 2026 denying the employer's request for full Board review but amending and superseding its March 2025 decision “to include additional relevant facts and clarify the [l]egal [a]nalysis that currently applies to” psychological injury claims. Under this new analysis, the Board again established the claim. The issuance of the March 2026 amended decision rendered this appeal moot (see Matter of Loper v. Suffolk County Water Auth., 247 A.D.3d 1441, 1441–1442, 254 N.Y.S.3d 738 [3d Dept 2026]; Matter of Djukanovic v. Metropolitan Cleaning LLC, 177 A.D.3d 1060, 1060–1061, 109 N.Y.S.3d 917 [3d Dept 2019]; cf. Matter of Chalcoff v. Project One, 12 A.D.3d 872, 872, 784 N.Y.S.2d 738 [3d Dept 2004]; Matter of Raynor v. Allegheny Ludlum Steel Corp., 36 A.D.2d 1007, 1007, 322 N.Y.S.2d 308 [3d Dept 1971] ). Although both Board decisions reached the same ultimate conclusion to establish the claim, the March 2026 decision “is not substantially similar to the one on appeal and, indeed,” establishes the claim under a different legal analysis (Matter of Loper v. Suffolk County Water Auth., 247 A.D.3d at 1442, 254 N.Y.S.3d 738). Contrary to the employer's contention, the merits of the March 2026 decision are not reviewable in this appeal (see id.; Matter of Rubino v. City of New York, 27 A.D.2d 588, 588, 27 A.D.2d 588 [3d Dept 1966]; see also CPLR 5517).
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.
Corcoran, J.
Clark, J.P., Pritzker, Ceresia and Mackey, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: CV-25-0636
Decided: September 10, 2026
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Make It a Preferred Google Search Source
Add to GoogleGet help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)