Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Remzi ALIJAJ, appellant.
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Edward T. McLoughlin, J.), rendered March 4, 2022, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that his plea of guilty was not knowing, voluntary, and intelligent is unpreserved for appellate review, since the defendant did not move to withdraw his plea or otherwise raise this issue before the County Court (see CPL 470.05[2]; People v. Peque, 22 N.Y.3d 168, 182, 980 N.Y.S.2d 280, 3 N.E.3d 617; People v. Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662, 666, 529 N.Y.S.2d 465, 525 N.E.2d 5). In any event, the record demonstrates that the defendant's plea of guilty was entered knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently (see People v. Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9, 17, 471 N.Y.S.2d 61, 459 N.E.2d 170; People v. Luck, 175 A.D.3d 1430, 1431, 109 N.Y.S.3d 220).
The defendant's further contention that the County Court erred in failing to inquire into his mental competency to enter a plea of guilty is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v. Socci, 160 A.D.3d 904, 905, 71 N.Y.S.3d 896; People v. Washington, 134 A.D.3d 963, 963, 20 N.Y.S.3d 896). In any event, the contention is without merit (see People v. Tortorici, 92 N.Y.2d 757, 765, 767, 686 N.Y.S.2d 346, 709 N.E.2d 87; People v. Leasure, 177 A.D.3d 770, 772, 114 N.Y.S.3d 367).
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the record demonstrates that he knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v. Sanders, 25 N.Y.3d 337, 341–342, 12 N.Y.S.3d 593, 34 N.E.3d 344; People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 256–257, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145). The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate review of his excessive sentence claim (see People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d at 261, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145; People v. Morrow, 198 A.D.3d 922, 923, 152 N.Y.S.3d 840).
DUFFY, J.P., IANNACCI, WOOTEN and GENOVESI, JJ., concur.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2022–02588
Decided: June 21, 2023
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)