PEOPLE EX REL KONAN v. IMPERATI (2023)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

The PEOPLE, etc., EX REL. Ryanne KONAN, on behalf of Camay Pryce, petitioner, v. Kirk IMPERATI, etc., et al., respondents.

2023–04801

Decided: June 09, 2023

MARK C. DILLON, J.P., ANGELA G. IANNACCI, JOSEPH J. MALTESE, LILLIAN WAN, JJ.

Ryanne Konan, Wappingers Falls, NY, petitioner pro se. William V. Grady, District Attorney, Poughkeepsie, NY (Jennifer L. Fluck and Anna Diehn of counsel), respondent pro se and for respondent Kirk Imperati.

DECISION & JUDGMENT

Writ of habeas corpus in the nature of an application to release Camay Pryce upon her own recognizance or, in the alternative, to set reasonable bail upon Dutchess County Indictment Nos. 24/2023 and 70231/2023.

ADJUDGED that the writ is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The determination of the County Court, Dutchess County, did not violate “constitutional or statutory standards” (People ex rel. Klein v. Krueger, 25 N.Y.2d 497, 499, 307 N.Y.S.2d 207, 255 N.E.2d 552; see People ex rel. Rosenthal v. Wolfson, 48 N.Y.2d 230, 422 N.Y.S.2d 55, 397 N.E.2d 745).

DILLON, J.P., IANNACCI, MALTESE and WAN, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network