PEOPLE v. BOODOOSINGH (2023)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Percival BOODOOSINGH, appellant.

2017–05415

Decided: June 07, 2023

Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Samuel Barr of counsel), for appellant. Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Denise Pavlides of counsel), for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Elizabeth Foley, J.), rendered April 21, 2017, convicting him of criminal contempt in the first degree and criminal contempt in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the Supreme Court failed to advise him that he could be sentenced on the misdemeanor charge, as well as on the felony charge, is unpreserved for appellate review, as he did not move to withdraw his plea on that ground or object at the time of sentencing (see People v. Andrea, 98 A.D.3d 627, 949 N.Y.S.2d 654). In any event, the defendant's contention is without merit (see id. at 627, 949 N.Y.S.2d 654).

CONNOLLY, J.P., GENOVESI, VOUTSINAS and WAN, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law