Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
People of State of New York, respondent, v. Salvador Azpeitia, appellant.
Submitted—June 5, 2026
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Christopher Hoefenkrieg, J.), dated August 17, 2023, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6–C.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
On January 24, 2023, the defendant waived indictment and entered a plea of guilty under a superior court information to two counts of forcible touching, relating to two children under the age of 10 years.
After a hearing pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6–C), the Supreme Court miscalculated the defendant's points on the risk assessment instrument at 125 points, when he was in fact assessed 120 points, and denied his application for a downward departure from his presumptive risk level. However, the defendant was properly assessed sufficient points to render him presumptively a level three sex offender (see People v. Luy, 238 AD3d 916, 917; People v. Holmes, 222 AD3d 791; People v. Tobo, 184 AD3d 885; People v. Lewis, 178 AD3d 864; People v. Mosley, 106 AD3d 1067; People v. Lewis, 37 AD3d 689, 690).
Further, the defendant's application for a downward departure from his presumptive risk level was properly denied. The defendant did not demonstrate how the alleged mitigating factors, including his family situation, which was detrimentally affected by these offenses, would reduce his risk of reoffending (see People v. Green, _ NY3d _, 2026 N.Y. Slip Op 03378).
Accordingly, we affirm the order appealed from.
BARROS, J.P., GENOVESI, FORD and WAN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Darrell M. Joseph
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 2023–08337
Decided: July 15, 2026
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)