Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Anthony SMALL, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, Anthony J. Annucci, Commissioner, Respondent.
MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT
Based upon an investigation that included the use of a confidential informant, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with assaulting an inmate by punching him in the mouth and causing a minimally displaced fracture to his jaw. Following a tier III hearing, petitioner was found guilty of that charge and that determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.
We are unpersuaded by petitioner's contention that he was improperly denied the right to call the victim of the assault without further inquiry from the Hearing Officer. The record does not reflect that the victim ever agreed to testify. Further, after petitioner requested the victim as a witness, the record reveals that a correction officer inquired of the victim whether he would testify, but the victim refused, signing a witness refusal form. As such, the Hearing Officer was not required to make any further inquiry (see Matter of Ortiz v. Annucci, 163 A.D.3d 1383, 1385, 80 N.Y.S.3d 746 [2018]; Matter of Ballard v. Annucci, 156 A.D.3d 1013, 1015, 66 N.Y.S.3d 84 [2017]; Matter of Harrison v. Venettozzi, 150 A.D.3d 1508, 1509, 55 N.Y.S.3d 498 [2017], lv denied 30 N.Y.3d 901, 2017 WL 4542713 [2017]).
To the extent that petitioner challenges the confidential information, the record establishes that the information received was sufficiently detailed and corroborated for the Hearing Officer to independently assess its reliability (see Matter of Latson v. Annucci, 171 A.D.3d 1319, 1320, 95 N.Y.S.3d 910 [2019]; Matter of Sumter v. Annucci, 168 A.D.3d 1306, 1307, 92 N.Y.S.3d 453 [2019]). The confidential information, together with the misbehavior report, related documentation and the hearing testimony provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Sumter v. Annucci, 168 A.D.3d at 1307, 92 N.Y.S.3d 453; Matter of Ellison v. Annucci, 142 A.D.3d 1233, 1234, 38 N.Y.S.3d 631 [2016]).
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Garry, P.J., Egan Jr., Aarons, Rumsey and Pritzker, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 527902
Decided: August 01, 2019
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)