Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Robert LYNN, Petitioner, v. STATE of New York, Respondent, New York State Public Employment Relations Board, Appellant.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to compel respondent Public Employment Relations Board (hereinafter PERB) to issue determinations on two improper practice charges that he filed in 2014. In lieu of answering, PERB moved to dismiss the petition for, among other reasons, failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Respondent State of New York separately moved, pre-answer, to dismiss the petition insofar as asserted against it on the ground that it was not a proper party to the proceeding. Supreme Court granted the State's motion, denied PERB's motion and granted the petition on the merits, directing PERB to issue a determination on petitioner's improper practice charges within 60 days of service upon PERB of a copy of its order with notice of the entry. PERB appeals, invoking an automatic stay of Supreme Court's judgment (see CPLR 5519[a][1] ).
During the pendency of this appeal, PERB issued a determination on petitioner's improper practice charges, thereby providing petitioner with all of the relief that he requested in his petition (see e.g. Matter of Johnson v. Evans, 76 A.D.3d 1164, 1164, 907 N.Y.S.2d 728 [2010], lv denied 16 N.Y.3d 702, 2011 WL 135304 [2011]; Matter of Cipperley v. Town of E. Greenbush, 240 A.D.2d 984, 985, 659 N.Y.S.2d 552 [1997]; Matter of Saratoga Harness Racing v. Corbisiero, 216 A.D.2d 776, 777, 628 N.Y.S.2d 442 [1995] ). Thus, the rights of the parties would not be affected by a determination of this appeal on the merits, and it has therefore been rendered moot (see Matter of Hearst Corp. v. Clyne, 50 N.Y.2d 707, 713–714, 431 N.Y.S.2d 400, 409 N.E.2d 876 [1980]; Matter of Saratoga Harness Racing v. Corbisiero, 216 A.D.2d at 777, 628 N.Y.S.2d 442). We are unpersuaded by PERB's contention that the exception to the mootness doctrine applies (see generally Matter of Hearst Corp. v. Clyne, 50 N.Y.2d at 714, 431 N.Y.S.2d 400, 409 N.E.2d 876). The controversy presented by this case evaded our review solely because PERB issued the requested determination during the pendency of the appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as moot.
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.
Clark, J.
Garry, P.J., Egan Jr., Lynch and Aarons, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 526445
Decided: May 16, 2019
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)