Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Danyel J. TITUS, Appellant.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Defendant pleaded guilty to criminal mischief in the third degree and was sentenced to five years of probation. Thereafter, he was charged with violating the terms of his probation after he was arrested and charged with burglary in the third degree. As part of a global disposition involving the violation of probation charge, as well as a plea to the reduced charge of attempted burglary in the third degree, defendant, as is relevant here, admitted to the violation of probation. Defendant's probation was revoked and he was sentenced, in accordance with the terms of the plea agreement, to a prison term of 1 to 4 years, to be served concurrently with the sentence imposed in connection with the attempted burglary conviction. Defendant appeals.
The judgment must be reversed. Defendant's admission to the violation of probation was induced by the explicit promise that his sentence thereon would run concurrently with the attempted burglary sentence. This Court, however, has reversed the judgment convicting defendant of attempted burglary in the third degree (People v. Titus, ––– A.D.3d ––––, 95 N.Y.S.3d 900, 2019 WL 1473613 [decided herewith] ). The reversal nullifies the express promise that materially induced defendant to admit to the violation of probation. Because “we cannot say that defendant would have ․ pleaded guilty to the [violation of probation charge] ․ had it not been for the [attempted burglary in the third degree] conviction,” his plea to this charge must be vacated (People v. Pichardo, 1 N.Y.3d 126, 130, 769 N.Y.S.2d 791, 802 N.E.2d 141 [2003]; see People v. Rowland, 8 N.Y.3d 342, 345, 834 N.Y.S.2d 58, 865 N.E.2d 1224 [2007]; People v. Brewington, 162 A.D.3d 1105, 1106, 78 N.Y.S.3d 495 [2018]; People v. Price, 113 A.D.3d 883, 885, 978 N.Y.S.2d 409 [2014] ).
ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, on the law, and matter remitted to the County Court of Broome County for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Court's decision.
Egan Jr., J.
Garry, P.J., Lynch, Devine and Rumsey, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 109608
Decided: April 04, 2019
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)