Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Shari PERL, Plaintiff, v. Andrea PERL, Defendant.
The following papers were read on this motion for
PAPERS/NUMBERED
Notice of Motion/Order to Show Cause—Affidavits—Exhibits 1–2, Exh A–M
Answering Affidavits—Exhibits 3,4, Exh 1–5
Replying Affidavits 5, Exh A–F
Martin Evans, who at the time was the guardian of plaintiff Shari Perl, brought this motion, sequence 68, in 2011. The motion seeks to dismiss the counterclaims which defendant Andrea Perl brought against him. Defendant Andrea Perl cross-moved for permission to sue Martin Evans and for the appointment of a separate guardian ad litem for Shari Perl's daughter Bridget Hannah Herman. The reply papers are dated June 29, 2011.
Mr. Evans was appointed as Shari Perl's guardian pursuant to an Article 81 proceeding which her mother, Rebecca Perl, commenced in 2006. On November 4, 2011, Martin Evans died. This case was stayed for this and other reasons until June 26, 2017, when Justice Lucy Billings granted motion sequence number 79 and lifted the stay. By this point, Mr. Evans had been substituted as Shari Perl's guardian. The new guardian is Nina Epstein, and the parties have amended the caption to substitute her name for that of Martin Evans.
In light of the above, Martin Evans no longer is part of this lawsuit. Therefore, this Court lacks jurisdiction over him. Andrea Perl must proceed against him separately, if she desires to continue litigating her counterclaims, or else add him as a party to this lawsuit. Moreover, because he is deceased, any claims against him should be asserted against his estate. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that the motion and cross-motion are denied.
Carmen Victoria St. George, J.
Response sent, thank you
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 602898/2005
Decided: June 19, 2018
Court: Supreme Court, New York County, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
FindLaw for Legal Professionals
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)