Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The People, etc., respondent, v. Vernon Leshore, appellant.
Submitted—September 6, 2022
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Stephanie Zaro, J.), rendered November 27, 2018, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (two counts), criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and assault in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant's motion to withdraw his plea of guilty. “A motion to withdraw a plea of guilty rests within the sound discretion of the court, and generally the court's determination will not be disturbed absent an improvident exercise of discretion” (People v. Boria, 157 AD3d 811, 811; see CPL 220.60[3]; People v. Alexander, 97 N.Y.2d 482, 485; People v. Street, 144 AD3d 711, 711–712; People v. Jemmott, 125 AD3d 1005, 1006). “ ‘Generally, a plea of guilty may not be withdrawn absent some evidence of innocence, fraud, or mistake in its inducement’ ” (People v. Boria, 157 AD3d at 811, quoting People v. Smith, 54 AD3d 879, 880; see People v. Tomlinson, 178 AD3d 967, 967). Here, the record demonstrates that the defendant's plea of guilty was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered (see People v. Alexander, 97 N.Y.2d at 486).
By pleading guilty, the defendant forfeited appellate review of his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel to the extent that the claim does not directly involve the plea negotiation (see People v. Boria, 157 AD3d at 812; People v. Dunne, 106 AD3d 928, 928). To the extent that the defendant contends that ineffective assistance of counsel affected the voluntariness of his plea, the record demonstrates that the defendant received the effective assistance of counsel (see People v. Penaranda, 178 AD3d 858, 858; People v. Boria, 157 AD3d at 812).
LASALLE, P.J., MILLER, GENOVESI and WAN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Maria T. Fasulo
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2019–00387 (Ind.No. 164 /17)
Decided: September 28, 2022
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)