Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Dmitri Bourianov, appellant, v. Richard H. Lovell, respondent.
Submitted—January 14, 2021
DECISION & ORDER
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for intentional infliction of emotional distress, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Timothy J. Dufficy, J.), entered June 28, 2019. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted that branch of the defendant's motion which was pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) to dismiss the complaint.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
In February 2019, the plaintiff commenced this action against the defendant, inter alia, to recover damages for intentional infliction of emotional distress alleging that the defendant engaged in a sexual relationship with the plaintiff's wife as well as other activities which caused the plaintiff emotional harm. The defendant moved, among other things, to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) for failure to state a cause of action. In an order entered June 28, 2019, the Supreme Court, inter alia, granted that branch of the motion. The plaintiff appeals.
The Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the defendant's motion which was pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) to dismiss the complaint. Accepting the plaintiff's factual allegations as true, the plaintiff failed to state a cause of action alleging intentional infliction of emotional distress (see Ajie Chen v. Deliso, 169 AD3d 761, 762; see e.g. Sahid v. Chambers, 237 A.D.2d 175, 175). As a matter of law, the defendant's alleged conduct did not rise to such an extreme or outrageous level as to meet the threshold requirements for intentional infliction of emotional distress (see Ajie Chen v. Deliso, 169 AD3d at 762; Leibowitz v Bank Leumi Trust Co. of N.Y., 152 A.D.2d 169, 182). Further, as this was the only substantive cause of action asserted, the separately pleaded cause of action seeking punitive damages was also subject to dismissal (see Ajie Chen v. Deliso, 169 AD3d at 762; Tighe v North Shore Animal League Am., 142 AD3d 607, 610).
RIVERA, J.P., DUFFY, IANNACCI and WOOTEN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2019–08926 (Index No. 703513 /19)
Decided: March 31, 2021
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)