Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: DAVID EE., Appellant, v. LAQUANNA FF., Respondent.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Franklin County (Main Jr., J.), entered November 27, 2017, which, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 6, dismissed the petition for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
Petitioner is the father of two children (born in 2002 and 2011). He commenced this proceeding in October 2017 seeking visitation. Upon review of the petition, Family Court, sua sponte, found that the children resided in Georgia and dismissed the petition with prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Petitioner appeals.
In his petition, petitioner alleged that respondent is an aunt of the children who obtained temporary guardianship of them following the mother's death and, further, that the children reside with respondent in Georgia; notably, however, he did not allege that a New York court had made a prior custody determination involving the children, nor did he allege any circumstances involving the children that would support a specific basis for jurisdiction. Thus, the petition fails to allege any facts that would provide New York with jurisdiction to make the determination in this case (see Domestic Relations Law §§ 76, 76–a; Matter of Beresford v. Yokes, 44 A.D.3d 1169, 1169–1170, 843 N.Y.S.2d 528 [2007] ) and, therefore, Family Court did not err by dismissing this proceeding without a hearing (see Matter of Beresford v. Yokes, 44 A.D.3d at 1170, 843 N.Y.S.2d 528). However, inasmuch as Family Court dismissed the proceeding for lack of subject matter jurisdiction based solely upon a review of petitioner's sparse pro se petition and without reaching the merits, it erred in dismissing the proceeding with prejudice (see Matter of Daryl D. v. Shameeka W., 161 A.D.3d 416, 416, 72 N.Y.S.3d 831 [2018] ).
ORDERED that the order is modified, on the law, without costs, by reversing so much thereof as dismissed the petition with prejudice; petition dismissed without prejudice; and, as so modified, affirmed.
Rumsey, J.
Lynch, J.P., Clark, Mulvey and Devine, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 526268
Decided: January 17, 2019
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)