Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Ellen A. Young, respondent, v. Bryce J. Young, appellant.
Submitted—April 19, 2018
DECISION & ORDER
In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals from a money judgment of the Family Court, Westchester County (Mary Ann Scattaretico–Naber, J.), dated January 8, 2018. The money judgment, upon an order of the same court dated March 2, 2017, made after a hearing, directing the father to pay half of the total amount of counsel fees awarded to the attorney for the child, is in favor of the attorney for the child and against the father in the total sum of $10,556.88.
ORDERED that on the Court's own motion, the notice of appeal from the order is deemed to be a premature notice of appeal from the money judgment (see CPLR 5520[c] ); and it is further,
ORDERED that the money judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Courts are authorized to direct that “ ‘a parent who has sufficient financial means to do so pay some or all of the [attorney for the child's] fees' ” (Pascazi v. Pascazi, 65 AD3d 1202, 1203, quoting Matter of Plovnick v. Klinger, 10 AD3d 84, 89; see 22 NYCRR 36.4; Judiciary Law § 35[3]; Rupp–Elmasri v. Elmasri, 8 AD3d 464; Jain v. Garg, 303 A.D.2d 985, 986; Pascarelli v. Pascarelli, 283 A.D.2d 472). Further, the mere fact that the attorney for the child adopted positions that were not favorable to the father does not demonstrate that the attorney for the child was biased against the father (see Matter of Luizzi v. Collins, 60 AD3d 1062, 1063). In custody proceedings, the role of the attorney for the child is to “zealously advocate the child's position,” not the positions of the parents (22 NYCRR 7.2[d] ). Under the circumstances of this case, we agree with the Family Court's determination to direct the father to pay half of the total amount of counsel fees awarded to the attorney for the child (see Pascazi v. Pascazi, 65 AD3d at 1203; Pedreira v. Pedreira, 34 AD3d 225; Matter of Plovnick v. Klinger, 10 AD3d at 91).
RIVERA, J.P., DILLON, BRATHWAITE NELSON and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2017–03589 (Docket No. V–8220–12)
Decided: May 30, 2018
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)