Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: MICHAEL H. MORGAN, Petitioner, v. Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.
MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT
DONALD VENETTOZZI, as Acting
Director of Special Housing
Calendar Date: October 24, 2017
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to challenge a tier III disciplinary determination finding him guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the mandatory $5 surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's inmate account. “Although petitioner seeks to be restored to the status he enjoyed prior to the disciplinary determination, including reinstatement to his prison job ․, inmates have no constitutional or statutory right to their prior housing or programming status” (Matter of Chao v. Hollingshead, 141 AD3d 1072, 1072 [2016] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Matter of Folk v. Annucci, 122 AD3d 977, 978 [2014]; see also Matter of Harrison v. Annucci, 153 AD3d 1495, 1495 [2017]; Matter of Scott v. Fischer, 95 AD3d 1576, 1577 [2012] ). Accordingly, and inasmuch as petitioner has received all of the relief to which he is entitled, the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Harrison v. Annucci, 153 AD3d at 1495; Matter of Chao v. Hollingshead, 141 AD3d at 1072). As the record reflects that petitioner paid a reduced filing fee of $15, and he has requested a refund thereof, we grant such request for reimbursement of said amount.
Egan Jr., J.P., Rose, Clark, Aarons and Prizker, JJ., concur.
ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs, but with disbursements in the amount of $15.
ENTER:
Robert D. Mayberger
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 524974
Decided: December 14, 2017
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)